Blog Essay Class 3

This week’s readings were on the topic of entertainment media. 

Ch. 3 talked about how powerful seemingly ordinary TV shows can be. I had no idea that the Pentagon provides subsidies to TV shows and films that portray the military in a positive light. It makes you wonder what ideals other shows are promoting. The main takeaway point of this chapter for me was understanding and looking beyond the surface to see that there are hidden agendas everywhere. Part of the democratic process is to be informed, so it’s pretty astounding how we as consumers simply view certain shows for their shallow surface value. This idea was illustrated in the chapter’s analyzation of Chocolat, a film I just assumed was about a woman, her daughter and some really tasty chocolates. Maybe we all know on a subconscious level that shows like Real Housewives or MTV’s Sweet 16 are all about materialism and superficiality, but it’s like a train wreck from which we can’t pry our eyes. And obviously the rest of the population agrees, which is why there are so many spinoffs and franchises of something like Real Housewives. Shows like Honey Boo Boo, Little People Big World, Amish Mafia, Gypsy Wedding and the like quench our seemingly insatiable thirst for watching people on the fringes of society—the freaks. But this is nothing new—think about circus sideshows. We are entertained and spellbound by the “spectacle.” The chapter also discusses one of my favorite shows, Sex and the City. Though I understand the criticism, I don’t think the show is a bad example. By watching the show, you realize you aren’t JUST a “Carrie” or a “Samantha”…. You’re all of them. Your boyfriend or spouse isn’t Steve, or Mr. Big, or Aiden or Smith. He’s all of them. People are multi-faceted, and though the show seems to pigeon-hole each character, it also shows viewers that you are more than the sum of your parts, and you can be Carrie one day and Samantha the next. An issue I do feel is unrealistic is the financial aspect—how can Carrie afford designer shoes and a great apartment when she’s just a columnist? It’s definitely providing an unrealistic and highly romanticized view of a journalist’s life. Not only that, but for Charlotte too, who works in a gallery.

Another issue raised in this chapter was globalization. Popular American shows are syndicated around the world (“entertainment is more globalized than news,” p. 53). But many of these shows contain cultural norms, references and rituals that are specific to this country—so how can we measure or account for the way in which other countries will take those norms? Example: I have been told by many of the Asian students in this college that they watched American shows like Gossip Girl in China. They probably thought that’s how many Americans behave and live, which isn’t actually true. How does this impact their view of American culture?

Ch. 17: What influence or implications do cultural or ethnic “niche” shows have? Example: Jersey Shore (“Italian Americans”); Shahs of Sunset (Persian/Jewish Americans); Duck Dynasty/Swamp People (rural/country Americans)? What kind of example are these shows setting for young people? As a person of Persian heritage watching Shahs of Sunset, on one hand I was appalled at how the characters were basically caricatures of Persian behaviors/stereotypes, but part of me was happy that Persians weren’t being ignored on TV for once (or portrayed in an unfavorable light, like as a terrorist). Which is the lesser of the two evils?

Strasser’s article about the boy and the Easy Bake oven reminded me of a memory from my childhood. Growing up an only child, I only had mostly female toys such as Barbies. Whenever my male cousin would come over, he would play Barbies with me. He made me promise not to tell anyone—probably because he was older than me and had been already indoctrinated by gender stereotypes. I, on the other hand, had no idea why it was socially unacceptable for him to play with dolls until much later. (By the way, he’s a straight guy… if that matters at all.) We see men in traditionally “female” jobs/roles such as fashion designers and assume they’re gay. The other day I was looking at the staff of Elle Magazine and saw Kevin O’Malley’s photo. Joe Zee is a very well-known gay Elle staff member, but I was a little shocked when I read Mr. O’Malley’s biography and it said he was married and lived in NY with his four boys. I consider myself a pretty progressive person and yet I had fallen victim to easy stereotyping. Lesson: don’t assume.

Re: Harassment, Misogyny and Silencing on YouTube, I found it disturbing to read the user comments after her YouTube post. But sadly, this is common. Feminism has such a negative connotation—still—and people don’t understand its implications or its very basic definition. This article discusses the Sarkeesian issue further. Does the physical appearance of the female matter? If Sarkeesian had been a hyper-sexualized blonde woman, would she have been addressed differently? What do looks have to do with it?

“Anita Sarkeesian is controversial because she levels a critique at video games that suggests they are a male-centric entertainment medium. Some people feel threatened by this; others think she’s wrong.” – Erik Kain 

DQs:

– How do norms and rituals communicated in popular American shows shown in foreign countries impact their view of American culture?

– How psychologically harmful are reality TV shows to youth populations?

– How does reality TV promote ideas about American social mobility? Does it seem easy or hard to attain based on what you see depicted on-screen?

– What influence or implications do cultural or ethnic “niche” shows have?

 

This was a really good article about Asian American stereotypes on TV.

 

Nicki Karimipour; nickik1989@ufl.edu

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Blog Essay Class 3

  1. jessielynnking

    – How do norms and rituals communicated in popular American shows shown in foreign countries impact their view of American culture?

    You mentioned the quote from the text regarding national news vs. international entertainment. Perhaps in the past the government had greater influence over how the US was portrayed (example, the payments to producers who portrayed the army in a positive manner), but I would think with the expansion of reality TV, that may be less so today. However, I guess that brings up the discussion of whether reality TV really is “reality” or if it is scripted. I recall hearing the tales following Laguna Beach and The Hills of how while the show wasn’t necessarily scripted, characters were scheduled to meet in specific locations to discuss specific topics. Additionally, there also have been numerous tales about the editing processes that take place following. Directors and producers are sculpting a view of the American culture that I would hope foreign countries do not view as accurate!
    However, if that is all they are exposed to, people in foreign countries may not know any different. A few years ago I went on a tour around Europe with individuals from Europe, Australia, and the US. It was quite interesting the perception that the Australians had of us Americans. One group of Americans on the tour were from Boston, and the rest of us were from Florida, one being from Miami. Somehow, we all were dubbed the Miami girls, despite half of us never even visiting the place! Not only that, we were constantly working to convince them that our lives were not actually like the wild ones they’d seen portrayed on TV.
    I guess it goes back to media literacy and the realization that TV and movies are entertainment, not actual reality. Even ‘reality TV’ has an element of fiction, no matter how ‘real’ it claims to be. I doubt gross exaggerations of the “American life” will be going away anytime soon, so it may be of greater benefit to focus on reminding people that it is just TV.

    Also, in case you haven’t seen it, here is a little quiz that claims to let you know if you are a Miranda, a Charlotte, a Carrie, or a Samantha! http://www.buzzfeed.com/lyapalater/are-you-a-carrie-samantha-charlotte-or-miranda

    Reply
  2. littleredmermaid

    Awesome questions!
    Although American popular shows and songs are popular for a reason, I think that, when other countries hear them, they assume the stereotypes that unfortunately and quite often accompany our American culture is how we actually act, think and feel. As discussed in class, “Keeping Up with the Kardashians” may be a popular guilty pleasure in the United States; however, the majority of us are not rich and ditzy. This impact on the opinions that other countries and their residents have of us isn’t old news and we’re just as guilty. For example, the Japanese character in “Breakfast at Tiffany’s” named Mr. Yunioshi is portrayed as quick to anger with low English-speaking skills (and worst yet, he is played by a white American named Mickey Rooney). The portrayals of other races in an inaccurate light happen because there is a focus on populations as a whole and a lack of focus on individuality and different cultures within a population or race.
    As for the harm that reality television shows afflicts on youth, the answer is similar to above. Youth tend to compare themselves constantly to their peers and their heroes. Therefore, when an American teenager sees Kim Kardashian on television enjoying her wealth and fame, they wonder why they don’t have that much money. Or, another example, Teen Mom- impressionable young women may interpret getting pregnant as a way to get on television and become famous but miss out on the message that teen pregnancy puts them at risk for being single mothers, getting on welfare or missing out on a childhood or an education.
    I hate to refer ONCE AGAIN to the Kardashians (apparently a lot can be learned from those societal jesters) BUT once again upward mobility is promoted; however, the family fame is connected to their money which they inherited. This doesn’t say much for attaining social mobility by one’s own means. In a way, it is a reversal of the “American dream” in that the rich only get there through someone else’s death instead of their own determination and hard work. On the other hand, shows such as Honey Boo Boo and Buckwild depict the social mobility that can happen when society becomes interested in a culture that is so unlike their own they feel inclined to watch. But, then again, this also indicates that sheer luck brings you fame and mobility which rarely occurs.
    Your last question sort of goes hand-in-hand with being able to watch other cultures interact together by voyeurism through reality television shows. It would be nice to say that these shows give us insight to those who are different from us but let’s face it, reality television isn’t the National Geographic Channel… we’re laughing at other cultures when we watch them on television. It may not be mean-spirited laughter, but it doesn’t say, “I wish I was like so-and-so on Duck Dynasty.”

    -Carina

    Reply

Let me know what you think!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s